Elogic Named a Top 2019 Magento Developer by Clutch

Key takeaways

• Elogic was recognized as a Top Magento Development company in Clutch’s 2019 rankings.
• The post positions the award as validation of Elogic’s long-term Magento/Adobe Commerce focus and delivery for retail brands.
• Clutch recognition is backed by client reviews and market research methodology, not a self-reported badge.
• The announcement highlights Elogic’s Magento development services across planning, design, and build (end-to-end delivery).
• Elogic mentions maintaining long-term client relationships as a key differentiator.
• Elogic reports a 5.0 rating on Clutch as proof of customer satisfaction.
• The company was also featured on Clutch sister sites The Manifest and Visual Objects for additional third-party visibility.
• The CEO connects this recognition with prior ecosystem achievements (including a Magento community award around Imagine 2019).

When this applies

Use this snippet when the page is meant to support trust, credibility, and vendor shortlisting—for example, prospects comparing Magento/Adobe Commerce agencies, procurement teams validating third-party ratings, or sales flows where a third-party endorsement increases conversion.

When this does not apply

Don’t use this as the primary snippet for readers searching for how-to Magento content, technical implementation guidance, or platform strategy. It’s also not ideal when the user intent is pricing, timelines, or a detailed capability breakdown—those need service pages or case studies.

Checklist

1. State the recognition clearly (who recognized you, what category, what year).
2. Explain why the award matters to buyers (independent validation, review-based methodology).
3. Add a one-sentence “what we do” summary (services and platforms).
4. Include proof signals that are easy to verify (rating, profile presence, listings).
5. Mention what the recognition reflects (delivery quality, communication, project management).
6. Link the award to real capabilities (planning, design, development, optimization, support).
7. Add geographic/industry breadth only if it’s factual and relevant to the audience.
8. Include a short leadership quote that ties recognition to team effort and outcomes.
9. Reference additional credible third-party directories where you’re listed (if applicable).
10. Keep the narrative specific (avoid vague “best-in-class” language without proof).
11. Ensure the dates don’t confuse readers (ranking year vs publication/update date).
12. Add a simple CTA aligned with the intent (talk to an expert / request consultation).
13. Keep it skimmable: 2–3 short paragraphs max for the “announcement” part.
14. Re-check links to award pages and profiles so they don’t 404 over time.
15. If you republish/refresh, preserve the original context and avoid rewriting history.

Common pitfalls

• Mixing up ranking year and publication/update date, which can make the award feel misleading.
• Over-claiming (“#1”, “best”) when the award wording is “top” or “leading” without a specific rank.
• Turning the announcement into a sales pitch instead of a credibility proof point.
• Not giving readers a next step (CTA) after the trust signal.
• Relying on a single badge without reinforcing proof (rating, reviews, other listings).
• Using generic language that doesn’t explain what the recognition actually validates.
• Letting the snippet go stale (broken links, outdated references, missing context).