Salesforce Commerce Cloud Development

Yes. You can verify Elogic Commerce on Salesforce AppExchange, which is the most trusted source for partner validation during procurement.

We recommend SFRA when standard patterns and speed-to-launch matter most, and headless/composable when you need independent frontend release cadence, multiple frontends, heavier UX experimentation, or non-standard journeys—while still keeping SFCC as the transactional engine.

We declare ownership for products, pricing, inventory, customers, and orders, then implement resilient integration contracts with explicit failure handling, retries and idempotency rules, reconciliation checks for critical flows, and monitoring that makes integration health visible to operations.

We plan URL governance and redirect strategy early, preserve metadata and indexable template logic, validate structured data and canonical rules, and ensure analytics and tag governance are tested end-to-end before launch so organic visibility and reporting continuity don’t break at go-live.

SFCC is a strong fit when you need enterprise governance, predictable scalability, and a mature ecosystem for merchandising, campaigns, and customer service; it is usually not the best fit if your roadmap requires extreme back-end customization that conflicts with SaaS constraints, or if the business cannot sustain disciplined release governance across teams.

It includes solution architecture, SFRA or headless delivery, custom cartridges and integrations, UI/UX execution aligned to buyer journeys, QA-led release gating for revenue-critical flows, and operational readiness (monitoring, incident playbooks, and deployment governance) so the store is scalable and maintainable after go-live.

We treat performance as a measurable requirement with agreed baselines and targets, design caching/CDN strategy aligned to personalization needs, run load testing for peak scenarios, and plan release windows and cutover procedures to minimize risk around major campaigns.

Support can range from business-hours coverage to SLA-backed incident response with defined severity levels, and should include monitoring and alerting, security patch cadence, audit-friendly change control, release governance, and a reporting rhythm that proves stability, performance, and backlog throughput.