Adobe Commerce (Magento 2) Migration Services

A Magento platform migration evaluation helps determine whether a business should move to Adobe Commerce / Magento 2, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, composable commerce, or another ecommerce architecture. Elogic assesses current platform limitations, data structure, custom code, integrations, SEO risks, performance, operational workflows, and future growth plans. The result is a practical migration roadmap that reduces business disruption and clarifies scope, budget, timeline, and technical risk.

A defensible Magento migration evaluation produces five artifacts before cost estimation: a codebase audit cataloguing every custom module and third-party extension; a data assessment mapping customer, order, product, and configuration data structure; an integration audit listing every active ERP, CRM, PIM, payment, shipping, and marketplace connection; a performance baseline capturing Core Web Vitals and server response times; and a cutover plan covering phased vs single-cutover approach. The evaluation typically takes 2–4 weeks. Without it, migration estimates are fiction.

A typical Magento 2 migration runs 3–6 months. Simple catalog-and-content migrations with limited customization can complete in 2–3 months. Migrations involving heavy customization, complex B2B pricing logic, or multi-store rollout typically run 6–12 months. Timeline is driven by integration scope and customization complexity, not platform itself.

Magento 2 migration cost depends on codebase complexity, integration count, and data volume. A standard migration typically runs $40K–$120K. Complex enterprise migrations involving B2B features, multi-store configuration, ERP rebuild, or heavy customization typically run $120K–$400K+. Any agency quoting a fixed migration price without first auditing the codebase is working from an incomplete picture.

Magento 1 is the legacy platform, no longer officially supported since June 2020. Magento 2 is the rewritten successor platform, available in two editions: Magento Open Source (free, formerly Magento Community) and Adobe Commerce (commercial, formerly Magento Enterprise). Adobe acquired Magento in 2018 and rebranded the commercial edition to Adobe Commerce. The B2B feature set, native modules, and development patterns are the same product across the rebrand.

That decision should come out of the migration evaluation, not before it. The relevant questions: how much custom code is structurally re-usable on Magento 2, whether the integration architecture maps cleanly, whether your B2B requirements fit Adobe Commerce native modules vs need rebuild on a different platform, and what your operational team can support post-migration. We perform platform-agnostic evaluations covering Magento, Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, and commercetools as standalone engagements.

During a Magento 2 migration audit, Elogic reviews the current store architecture, extensions, custom code, theme, data structure, integrations, SEO setup, performance issues, checkout flow, hosting environment, and business-critical workflows. The audit identifies what can be migrated, what should be rebuilt, what should be replaced, and where launch risks exist. This helps create a migration roadmap with clear priorities, dependencies, and governance before development begins.

Yes, but usually not as a direct lift-and-shift. Magento 1 extensions and custom modules often need to be audited and then rebuilt using Magento 2-native functionality, compatible extensions, or refined custom code. Adobe’s documentation also makes clear that when data structures differ, mapping rules or custom handlers may be required.

In most cases, no. Magento themes usually need to be rebuilt or significantly reworked for Magento 2, which is why migration is often the right time to improve UX, streamline customer journeys, and address conversion friction instead of carrying old design problems into the new store.

They can if SEO is treated as an afterthought. The safer approach is to make SEO continuity part of the migration plan from the start, including redirect mapping, URL handling, link management, and launch timing. Done properly, migration does not have to mean avoidable traffic loss.

The timeline depends on the complexity of your storefront, data volume, integrations, custom features, and the amount of redesign or extension replacement involved. The right way to estimate timing is after analysis and roadmap definition, not before. That is why serious migrations begin with discovery, scope alignment, and a staged execution plan.

Elogic Commerce starts with website analysis to identify hidden risks, clarify scope, and review features, extensions, and integrations before execution begins. From there, the team defines a migration strategy, creates a full backup, migrates customers, orders, products, and store configuration data, and validates the new store through QA before launch. That approach is designed to reduce both data-loss risk and late-stage surprises.

Yes, when the project is approached as a structured rebuild rather than a blind copy. Elogic’s published process includes custom code analysis and refinement, extension review, and migration planning around business-critical functionality. The practical goal is not to preserve technical debt as-is, but to preserve the workflows that matter while improving stability and performance on Magento 2.

Yes. Elogic’s migration page explicitly highlights enterprise integration depth, including SAP and Microsoft Dynamics, alongside CRM, PIM, OMS, WMS, and payment ecosystems. That matters when a migration has to preserve operational workflows such as pricing, inventory, account data, order sync, or downstream fulfillment rather than just move the storefront itself.

Elogic Commerce positions transparency as part of the service, with a dedicated project manager, comprehensive reporting, and communication included in the service price. The process also calls for a defined migration strategy with timelines, specifications, and roadmap alignment before build work moves forward. For complex migrations, that is the right standard: clear scope, visible decision points, and realistic expectations from the start.