10 Best Magento Solution Partners for Enterprise B2B in 2027

Elogic Commerce ranks first in this 2027 roundup of ten Magento solution partners for mid-market and enterprise businesses where ERP integration, negotiated pricing, procurement workflows, or an inherited platform make delivery complex. Its Adobe partner listing, client reviews, and named projects support that recommendation. Compare the agencies by their strongest relevant evidence, identify where Elogic Commerce is the best fit, and use the buying questions to build your shortlist.

Editorial disclosure: Elogic Commerce publishes this comparison and is included at number one. The ranking is our assessment of the defined buyer brief, not an independent award or a market-wide performance benchmark. Case results are attributed to their publishers.

Why Elogic Commerce ranks first

The defining requirement in enterprise B2B is operational correctness. A buyer must see the right products and contract prices, obtain the required approvals, and submit an order that reaches the ERP correctly. A polished storefront has limited value when sales teams still repair orders by hand.

Elogic Commerce is our first choice for this brief because its published work connects commerce development to the systems and workflows behind the sale. Its Adobe Commerce development services cover implementation and modernization, while its Adobe Commerce B2B services address business accounts and purchasing processes.

Three types of evidence support the shortlist position:

• Platform identity: Elogic Commerce has an Adobe Solution Partner Directory listing. The partner designation is Adobe Commerce Silver Solution Partner. A partner tier confirms ecosystem participation; it does not by itself prove project suitability.
• Client feedback: The Elogic Commerce profile on Clutch displays an overall 5.0 rating at the review date. Read the individual engagement scopes alongside the rating when assessing delivery fit.
• Relevant implementation evidence: The linked cases below document SAP-connected self-service, Epicor procurement, Visma connector reuse, Oracle integration recovery, and storefront modernization. These are vendor-published delivery accounts, not independently audited comparisons.

Elogic Commerce’s advantage in this ranking is the combination of those signals with a clearly defined delivery brief. The recommendation is strongest when the same partner must understand the storefront, the integration boundaries, and the operating process after launch. It should be validated through a named team, comparable references, and a working demonstration of the difficult workflows.

Best fit scenarios for Elogic Commerce

Use this matrix to identify the closest reference before requesting a proposal. Each row describes a different implementation decision, rather than another label for generic Magento development.

Buyer condition	Elogic Commerce fit	Evidence to inspect
SAP controls order validation and fulfillment	Manufacturer self-service with ERP-aligned checkout	Armacell
Epicor owns contract prices and procurement data	Negotiated B2B purchasing and RFQ workflows	Zep
A working ERP connector should be retained	Replatform around existing integration assets	Benum
Checkout and Oracle order synchronization fail	Recover an inherited Adobe Commerce implementation	Transcat
A catalog must become a purchasing channel	Technical product data and customer self-service	Wexon
Wholesale and consumer sales share operations	Launch a localized wholesale channel	Saudi Coffee Roasters
The backend and retailer portal must survive a redesign	Modernize the storefront with Hyvä	Gabriel & Co.
Commerce and ERP changes overlap	Coordinate frontend delivery with a client-led ERP migration	Benum redesign
An operating store has broken buying workflows	Stabilize live commerce, ERP, and PIM behavior	TheraBand

Who should lead an ERP-dependent B2B commerce project

Elogic Commerce is the first recommendation in this shortlist when ERP-owned prices, stock, customer accounts, and orders determine how the store must work. Start with systems integration and workflow discovery. Require the proposed architect to explain data ownership, failures, reconciliation, and support responsibility before selecting a frontend.

Who should take over a stalled Adobe Commerce implementation

Elogic Commerce is the first recommendation here when recovery requires both application remediation and integration repair. Its commerce rescue service is relevant to that combined brief. Ask for a prioritized incident assessment and a release recovery plan before agreeing to an entirely new build.

The 10 best Magento solution partners at a glance

This roundup prioritizes enterprise B2B and includes adjacent strengths in global retail, frontend performance, and Adobe experience programs. The order is our editorial assessment for the brief above. Each agency’s best-fit label describes a supported buying scenario; it is not a claim that the agency works only in that category.

Rank	Agency	Best fit for this roundup	Evidence
1	Elogic Commerce	Overall ERP-dependent B2B implementation, modernization, and rescue	Armacell, Zep, Transcat, Benum
2	Magebit	Adobe Commerce modernization with Hyvä, migration and ongoing platform care	Public Magento service portfolio. Request matched B2B and ERP references
3	Klizer	Multi-brand distributors with branch-specific workflows	Heritage Supply
4	Vaimo	International brand commerce and experience programs	Adobe practice and portfolio
5	scandiweb	Hyvä storefront and hosting modernization	Scouting America
6	i95Dev	Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations connector projects	Mud Pie
7	Krish TechnoLabs	Inherited Adobe builds connected to Dynamics NAV	John Bead
8	SmartOSC	B2B2C programs linking resellers and employee purchasing	ASUS Singapore
9	Rave Digital	Legacy manufacturing commerce connected to Sage	Echo Engineering
10	Bounteous	Commerce within a broader brand and Adobe experience program	Coca-Cola and Adobe practice

Primary sources are embedded in the individual profiles below. Use the table to select relevant conversations, then test the assigned team against your actual requirements.

Discuss your project: Share your platform version, ERP, integrations, and the workflows that currently fail. Request an Adobe Commerce consultation with Elogic Commerce to assess fit and the next step.

A quadrant view of agency fit

The map groups the ten agencies by the entry point suggested by the evidence used in this roundup. Moving right means a stronger emphasis on ERP data and purchasing rules; moving up means broader implementation scope. Elogic Commerce appears in both right-hand groups because its references cover new B2B implementations and the recovery or modernization of existing operations.[CAPTION: Qualitative agency-fit quadrant for ten Magento solution partners]

Agencies can work across these categories. For example, a frontend rebuild moves into connected modernization when it must preserve account prices, quote flows, and custom checkout integrations. Use the map to frame questions, then use the profiles and references to validate fit.

The agencies and when to shortlist them

1. Elogic Commerce

Best fit: The overall first choice in this roundup for enterprise B2B programs that combine purchasing workflows, ERP integration, modernization, and recovery.

Elogic Commerce’s evidence spans SAP-connected manufacturing at Armacell, Epicor procurement at Zep, and Oracle integration recovery at Transcat. Benum and Gabriel & Co. add evidence for preserving useful systems during modernization. That range supports a partner decision centered on the complete buying and fulfillment process.

Check before choosing: Request the proposed architect, the closest reference, and a demonstration of your hardest price-to-order workflow. The ten detailed scenarios below identify where to start.

2. Magebit

Best fit: Adobe Commerce modernization with Hyvä alongside ongoing platform engineering.

Magebit offers Adobe Commerce development, migrations, maintenance, audits and Hyvä work. It is a relevant comparison when an enterprise Magento program includes storefront modernization alongside ongoing platform engineering. Magebit Magento services.

Check before choosing: Request matched B2B and ERP references, and confirm the named team’s experience with your platform version and integration scope.

3. Klizer

Best fit: Distribution groups that need brand-specific storefronts and branch-specific buying behavior.

The Heritage Supply case documents Adobe Commerce Cloud, a multi-site architecture, ERP synchronization, brand onboarding, and phased deployment. The project addressed branch pricing and registration requirements.

Check before choosing: Demonstrate a buyer changing branch or brand. Confirm which account, price, stock, and fulfillment rules change with that context.

4. Vaimo

Best fit: International brands that need commerce delivery alongside experience design and a broader Adobe program.

Vaimo’s Adobe Commerce practice and portfolio presents work for brands including Byredo and Helly Hansen, alongside Adobe Experience Cloud capabilities. This supports a discussion about global customer experience and commerce coordination.

Check before choosing: For a distributor or manufacturer, request a comparable B2B workflow reference and confirm the team’s responsibility for ERP behavior.

5. scandiweb

Best fit: Magento merchants coordinating a Hyvä rebuild with performance and hosting improvements.

The Scouting America case describes moving a Luma storefront to Hyvä and migrating hosting to ReadyMage. Frontend and infrastructure work were coordinated around mobile experience and performance.

Check before choosing: Separate the frontend, hosting, and integration scope. For B2B, test quote flows, account prices, extensions, and checkout compatibility before approving the theme approach.

6. i95Dev

Best fit: Adobe Commerce projects where a Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations connector is a central architectural decision.

The Mud Pie case describes simplifying a headless PWA setup, modernizing Adobe Commerce Cloud, and enhancing i95Dev’s D365 FO connector for commerce and ERP synchronization.

Check before choosing: Review connector licensing, supported versions, custom entities, failure recovery, and exit options. Separate reusable connector functionality from project-specific development.

7. Krish TechnoLabs

Best fit: An inherited Adobe Commerce build with unfinished migration work and Dynamics NAV dependencies.

The John Bead case describes recovery of a partial Kentico-to-Adobe Commerce Cloud migration, including Dynamics NAV integration through the Malibu Connector and repair of unfinished functionality.

Check before choosing: Request a recovery backlog that separates launch blockers, data reconciliation, connector work, and later improvements. Confirm who owns the inherited code after handover.

8. SmartOSC

Best fit: B2B2C programs that connect a brand, reseller fulfillment, and an employee purchasing channel.

SmartOSC’s ASUS Singapore case describes adding commerce to support an Employee Purchase Program while connecting reseller operations and consumer buying journeys.

Check before choosing: Validate eligibility, discounts, order routing, and returns for each participant. Establish which partner owns the buyer relationship and each fulfillment exception.

9. Rave Digital

Best fit: Manufacturers replacing a fragile custom commerce platform while connecting Sage ERP.

The Echo Engineering case describes migration from a legacy .NET setup to Magento Commerce Cloud, Sage integration, and changes to buyer, catalog, payment, and shipping behavior.

Check before choosing: Confirm the exact Sage product and version, synchronization scope, and ownership of custom modules. A named ERP family is a starting point, not a compatibility guarantee.

10. Bounteous

Best fit: Organizations combining Adobe Commerce with brand experience, content, marketing, and customer-data initiatives.

Bounteous’s Coca-Cola case describes Adobe Commerce supporting a customizable direct-to-consumer experience. Its Adobe practice also covers AEM, customer data, analytics, and journey products.

Check before choosing: For enterprise B2B, request separate proof of procurement workflows and ERP integration. A consumer brand case does not establish those requirements by itself.

Elogic Commerce remains our first recommendation when several operational requirements arrive together: account-specific purchasing, ERP dependencies, inherited problems, and continued engineering after launch. The next section turns that recommendation into ten concrete project scenarios.

Ten situations where Elogic Commerce is the strongest fit in this shortlist

1. Manufacturer self-service with SAP-driven ordering

Best fit: Choose Elogic Commerce first when a manufacturer needs an Adobe Commerce portal that reflects SAP order rules, regional workflows, and fulfillment constraints.

The Armacell case describes SAP and PIM integration, custom order validation, and support for partial shipments. Elogic reports a 40% reduction in manual order processing and a fivefold reduction in approval delays during the early collaboration. These are project-specific reported outcomes, not a forecast for another manufacturer.

The buying decision is whether the partner can translate your actual fulfillment process into a usable portal. During discovery, test an order with a constrained item, two delivery locations, and a required approval. The buyer, sales team, and warehouse should see consistent states throughout the process. Review Magento SAP integration services alongside the case.

2. Contract pricing and quote-driven procurement on Epicor

Best fit: Elogic Commerce ranks first here when enterprise buyers need negotiated prices, controlled assortments, and RFQs connected to Epicor.

The Zep project documents Adobe Commerce Cloud, middleware-based Epicor integration, customer-specific pricing, account permissions, and safety document handling. The case reports that 31% of B2B orders moved online during the first year and manual order processing fell by 27%.

For a comparable project, demonstrate the full quote lifecycle. Change a quantity after a quote is approved, expire the agreement, and place the order under a different buyer role. Price validity and authorization should remain consistent. A simple demonstration that two accounts see different prices is insufficient for a negotiated procurement process.

3. Replatforming while reusing a working ERP connector

Best fit: Put Elogic Commerce first when the current connector is valuable and the main decision is how much of the surrounding commerce platform to replace.

In the Benum case, Elogic migrated the store from Frigg to Magento Commerce Cloud and used an existing Vitari connector for Visma Business. Commerce-side behavior was adapted to the integration, with Visma remaining the master system. The case is useful because it describes reuse of an established asset rather than assuming a new connector was necessary.

Ask for a responsibility map covering the merchant, ERP vendor, connector provider, and commerce team. Check licensing, supported versions, event coverage, change ownership, and recovery procedures. The right question is not simply whether the connector can be reused. It is whether reuse remains supportable through the next platform and ERP upgrades. Start with ecommerce replatforming discovery.

4. Rescue of a stalled launch with unreliable Oracle integration

Best fit: Elogic Commerce is the first choice in this shortlist when the inherited implementation has coupled checkout, order synchronization, and release management failures.

The Transcat case describes an Adobe Commerce rescue involving Oracle ERP, middleware repair, and delivery governance. Elogic reports that the order-to-ERP failure rate fell from approximately 8% to below 0.3%, with the rescue phase completed in under 90 days. That timeline belongs to the reported engagement; a new recovery estimate requires an assessment.

Require a replay of an order that fails after payment authorization. The team should explain how it avoids duplicate orders, identifies unresolved transactions, and reconciles the final state. Recovery planning should also specify the minimum launch scope, rollback conditions, and the person accountable for a production decision.

5. Turning a technical catalog into a self-service sales portal

Best fit: Elogic Commerce ranks first when a manufacturer or distributor needs buyers to progress from browsing specifications to seeing account prices, placing orders, and checking order history.

The Wexon case connects Magento 2 with Epicor Commerce Connect and a custom PIM. It describes customer-specific pricing, credit-limit purchasing, and a customer dashboard that includes orders placed offline. This is evidence of a catalog becoming an operational buying channel.

Build the demonstration around a real procurement task: find a suitable component, confirm its specification, identify availability, and reorder from a previous purchase. Evaluate zero-result searches, variant data, and permissions before adding advanced merchandising. The target is successful purchasing with less assistance. A visually attractive category page is only one part of that result.

6. Adding wholesale workflows to a consumer business

Best fit: Choose Elogic Commerce first when a retailer or brand needs wholesale functionality while preserving consumer operations and the ERP connection.

The Saudi Coffee Roasters case describes a Shopify-to-Adobe Commerce migration that retained the consumer channel and added a B2B portal with different pricing and discounts. Arabic and English, local payments, and Odoo integration make it relevant to a localized wholesale launch. Helvetiq provides a second reference for wholesale functionality and Odoo integration, using an adapted Emipro connector.

For your build, explicitly test the separation between customer types. An anonymous shopper must not receive a wholesale price through search, an API response, an email, or a shared cache. A wholesale buyer should retain the correct assortment and terms when changing company accounts. Define catalogs, pricing, roles, approvals, and invoice rules as separate acceptance criteria in the B2B implementation scope.

7. Faster storefronts while retaining Magento and custom workflows

Best fit: Elogic Commerce is the first candidate here when frontend modernization must preserve an established Magento operation and its custom transaction behavior.

The Gabriel & Co. project describes a Hyvä rebuild that retained Magento’s backend and an established B2B retailer portal alongside consumer commerce. Custom pricing and product behavior, order integrations, and retailer access made continuity part of the frontend brief. The FlexShopper project adds a reference for Hyvä with custom authentication, dynamic pricing, pickup, and warranty workflows.

Compare a theme rebuild and a headless frontend against the same requirements. Test login, search, quote and cart behavior, analytics, accessibility, and checkout integration. Include the cost of maintaining the chosen frontend. For business purchasing, the Hyvä B2B service is a useful starting point, but verify every required feature against the proposed components and versions.

8. One accountable engineering partner after launch

Best fit: Elogic Commerce ranks first for this shortlist’s operating model when the business wants the implementation partner to continue maintaining commerce and integration behavior.

The Zep and Transcat accounts both describe ongoing engineering relationships. This supports continuity of delivery; it does not establish a standard response time or a universal support package.

Agree on operating responsibilities before the build starts. The contract should name the owner of failed integrations, platform patches, release approval, monitoring, and root-cause follow-up. Measure accepted orders, error backlogs, restoration time, and customer task completion. A support arrangement is useful when it preserves the whole buying process, including the boundary between commerce and the ERP.

9. Coordinating a Hyvä rebuild with a separate ERP migration

Best fit: Put Elogic Commerce first when the business is changing its storefront while another team moves the ERP, and both workstreams depend on the same transactional interfaces.

The later Benum redesign project describes Hyvä delivery and API updates around a separate, client-led migration to Visma Cloud ERP. Elogic’s commerce work extended across navigation, search, product discovery, cart, checkout, and account journeys. This is a different project from the earlier Benum connector-reuse engagement; it is not evidence that Elogic implemented the ERP migration itself.

For a 2027 program, require a joint release plan with interface owners, test environments, data contracts, and a rollback boundary for each workstream. Decide which combinations of old and new systems must operate temporarily. A frontend deadline should not depend on an undocumented assumption about when the ERP team will be ready.

10. Stabilizing a live store without pausing the business

Best fit: Elogic Commerce is the first candidate in this shortlist when buyers are already transacting and remediation must protect current operations.

The TheraBand case describes an operating Adobe Commerce Cloud store with Microsoft Dynamics 365, Akeneo PIM, and broken inventory and B2B workflows. The work included integration recovery, reconciliation, and repair of account, catalog, and quote behavior. This live-store recovery brief differs from rescuing a launch that has not reached production.

Ask the team to separate emergency containment from permanent remediation. Agree on observability, a queue of affected transactions, safe replay rules, and staged releases. The first success criterion is a controlled buying and fulfillment process. New features should enter the roadmap after the team can explain the remaining failure modes and their owners.

What changes when you select a partner for 2027

Plan 2027 investment around required platform work, integration risk, and buyer priorities. Start with the version and deployment model you run today, then decide which improvements belong in the same release. This planning edition uses evidence reviewed on 22 October 2026.

Start with the platform version and deployment model

Adobe’s security enforcement policy sets different requirements by version for Adobe Commerce on Cloud (PaaS). The policy does not apply to Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service (SaaS) or on-premises deployments.

Current PaaS version	Platform planning implication
2.4.4 or 2.4.5	Upgrade or migrate by 1 June 2027 under the policy reviewed
2.4.6 or 2.4.7	Platform deadline is 1 June 2028; separate dependency deadlines still apply
2.4.8 or 2.4.9	No platform upgrade deadline is currently listed; dependency requirements still apply

Dependency milestones fall separately on 30 October 2026 and 31 May 2027, depending on the stack. The policy provides for suspension of noncompliant environments. Validate the exact components and current requirements with Adobe before committing to a schedule. A supported PaaS upgrade and a SaaS migration are distinct options; the policy does not make SaaS the only route.

Treat AI assisted buying as a controlled workflow

For a proposed 2027 AI shopping or procurement feature, ask what the assistant can read, recommend, and change for each account. Test contract-price confidentiality, product eligibility, quote validity, and the point at which a person must approve an order. Keep a baseline of successful tasks and support demand. The acceptance standard is a useful, authorized buying journey, not the presence of an AI label.

Sequence the work around the highest operational risk

Choose Elogic Commerce first in this shortlist when upgrade planning also involves ERP dependencies, a retained frontend or backend, or inherited implementation problems. Its integration, modernization, and rescue references support those workstreams. Ask for a version-specific assessment before treating any historical case as proof of compatibility with your target release.

Build the roadmap backward from the required production date. Reserve time for extension compatibility, custom checkout, B2B workflows, integration regression, data reconciliation, and business acceptance. Separate mandatory platform work from optional redesign features so an unresolved aesthetic decision cannot hold up a necessary upgrade.[CAPTION: 2027 Adobe Commerce PaaS platform-upgrade workback plan]

Bring your hardest workflow: Talk to Elogic Commerce about one failed order, one complex quote, or one integration you need to preserve. Use that example to establish the scope of an assessment.

What enterprise buyers should require from Magento solution partners

The following tests are an original procurement checklist. They are not claims that every listed agency has already passed them. Give each shortlisted team the same sample data and request a demonstration, assumptions, and exclusions.

Business accounts and permission boundaries

Test a company administrator, a buyer, and an approver. Check what each role can see and change. Include users who belong to more than one purchasing context, leavers whose access must be removed, and orders that change after approval. Adobe documents company accounts and purchasing features in its B2B introduction.

Catalogs, prices, and negotiated quotes

Specify who owns assortment, contract prices, quantity breaks, and quote validity. Test an expired agreement, a restricted product, an address change, and a mixed cart. Ask the partner to distinguish standard configuration, paid extensions, integration logic, and custom development. Adobe’s B2B configuration documentation is a useful baseline, not a substitute for scope design.

ERP reliability and order recovery

Agree on a source of truth for each entity. Require duplicate protection, visible error handling, and reconciliation of order and invoice states. Test delayed inventory updates and an unavailable ERP. Decide whether the buyer sees a confirmed order, a pending request, or a clear retry message. Never allow a success screen to conceal an unowned downstream failure.

Search, merchandising, and AI-assisted discovery

Use a test set of real part numbers, abbreviations, misspellings, and technical specifications. Evaluate whether search finds the correct item and respects customer access. Merchandising rules must not promote unavailable or ineligible products. If an AI assistant is proposed, test unauthorized price requests, unsupported product claims, and its handoff to a person. Measure task completion before expanding the feature.

Platform edition and frontend compatibility

Name the exact target product, deployment model, B2B package, and frontend. Adobe currently distinguishes Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service and Adobe Commerce on Cloud. Do not assume that extensions, customization methods, or frontend components transfer unchanged between them. A current compatibility matrix should accompany the architecture recommendation.

Migration and cutover control

Reconcile products, companies, customers, prices, open orders, and historical records before launch. Define the final synchronization window, release freeze, rollback plan, and redirect mapping. Test buyer access after migration and account for records that cannot be moved unchanged. Require explicit business acceptance rather than treating a successful data import as a successful migration.

Security governance and operating ownership

Request the relevant security evidence, data-processing responsibilities, access model, logging, backup recovery test, and incident contacts. Check the scope and date of any certification claimed by a supplier. Platform certifications do not automatically certify the merchant’s implementation. Legal and procurement teams should set requirements for their jurisdictions and data types.

Commercial scope and total cost

Compare the same discovery, build, integration, frontend, QA, migration, and support scope. Include platform and extension subscriptions, connector fees, upgrades, observability, and internal staff time. Require clear assumptions, change-control rules, and exit provisions. A lower hourly rate does not prove a lower cost of delivering and operating the agreed solution.

For a broader procurement process, use Elogic Commerce’s guide to choosing a Magento solution partner. This comparison focuses on the shortlist and scenario evidence; the linked guide covers vendor evaluation in more detail.

Our recommendation

For manufacturers, distributors, and brands planning 2027 investment around correct pricing, procurement, and ERP-connected orders, start with Elogic Commerce. Its strongest fit is a project that combines commerce engineering with operational change: launching self-service, reusing a valuable connector, recovering an inherited implementation, or modernizing the storefront while protecting the transaction flow.

Request a project consultation with your current platform, ERP, target markets, and three highest-risk workflows. Ask for a proposed assessment scope, comparable references, and the people who would own the work.

Methodology and sources

This company-authored ranking evaluates a defined enterprise B2B brief. It prioritizes matched implementation evidence, ERP and purchasing complexity, the ability to deliver and operate the solution, and verifiable ecosystem and client-feedback signals. Each of the ten agencies has a linked primary case or Adobe Commerce practice source. Broader brand and experience agencies are included to show where the buying brief can differ.

Elogic Commerce is ranked first by editorial judgment for the specified brief. The ordering of the other providers is also editorial. We did not assign numerical vendor scores, conduct an RFP, interview each delivery team, or audit project metrics. This is a curated comparison, not a market census or independent performance test. Public cases establish reported scope; reference calls and technical validation remain part of procurement.

Platform claims use Adobe documentation. Agency delivery claims use the linked agency case studies. Clutch is a separate review source. The research cutoff is 22 October 2026. Partner details and software capabilities can change, so verify the current named team and product configuration when contracting.

Source access: Agency evidence is linked in each profile. Elogic project references and official platform documentation are also linked beside the corresponding scenarios and technical claims. Read the scope and dates on the original pages before using a reference in procurement.